When you are asked to think about a social policy,
generally you think of the positive things that should arise from them. You
think of all of the areas in a community that will better from them. You also
think of the people that are at loss because of the deficits they experience in
society. We are all aware that social policy is intended to improve social
welfare and help individuals meet their needs to function as a successful
individual. However, what happens when a social policy creates deficits, creates
more barriers, and creates an unsuccessful path for someone? What then, is the
point of a social policy?
In this blog entry, I am going to discuss abortion. I am
aware that this topic is touchy for some, and I am aware that some people are
very dominant in their stance on the subject and I would like to make it clear, before I begin to blog about it, that this blog isn’t meant to offend anyone or
cause any personal distress. Please accept my apologies in advance if any
emotional distress does arise. I simply chose this current topic because I found
its relevance to the women’s group I am apart of comparable to no other.
Abortion is a social issue for women because it is a
stigmatizing and challenging experience to go through. Some women are forbidden
to go through it, some women are scared to go through it, and some women
attempt to go through it but then cannot because it ends up being too late.
These reasons alone are enough for it to be a social issue that women are
unfortunately faced with. The elaboration of these issues only makes the issue
more difficult for women.
Did you know that not all hospitals perform abortions? Only
certain hospitals perform abortions in certain areas. This is limiting for
women. Did you know doctors aren’t taught how to perform an abortion in their
training? Doctors, who chose to be able to perform them, are required to take
courses in order to be certified. This is also limiting for women. I am from a
small city, in which will be used to put into perspective how limiting this can
be for women. In a city like Sault Ste. Marie, women aren’t always able to
access abortion clinics when they need to. This is because the doctor who
performs abortions is here on schedule and the doctor's schedule doesn’t always work
with every individual. This is also limiting because if the woman is unable to
meet with the doctor before it is too late to perform an abortion, she will need
to take another path in order to pursue her decision, which can be extremely
costly. This can be costly because of travel expenses and because other doctors
schedules not coinciding with theirs. In the end this can lead to the woman with no other
option than to have the child.
Recently the subject of abortion has re-opened and it has been in discussion in the House of Commons. As stated by Niki Ashton, the
issue of abortion was settled in 1988 and is still in conflict, which is a
clear representation of the gender gap that still exists in our society. Women are
still persevering in becoming equal with their male counterparts and the issue
of abortion is only a minor set back. Violating right of choice, and the right
of reproductive choice is only a temporary set back in my eyes.
With the past being proactive the future should only become
more than the past was. Although it seems were working the opposite way
we should be, many voices are speaking in attempt to remove unfair ceilings of
women’s rights. Quoted from an article I read, “National
News-paper Index, the press produces more articles on how the abortion question
affects various political candidacies and parties than on how woman with
unwanted pregnancies are affected by growing restrictions on abortion
services.” (p. 700) I think this is one of the better arguments I’ve heard on
the topic of abortion because the issue has become more popularity based than
restriction based. A woman’s life is what we are debating about. No matter the
reason, the causation, or the circumstance, at the end of the day the woman
making the decision will decide based on what is right for her own situation. In an
online news article I read Patrick Crane stated, “It is a medical decision between the
physician and the patient. It should be left there as all abortions should be.”
and that “Any woman can choose an abortion for any reason, and she doesn’t have
to tell us what it is. It’s none of our business.” This idea is what I would
like to end this entry with. At the end of the day, the woman has the right to
decide what is best suited for herself. We aren’t aware of her story and nor
should we be. Having a child is a very personal part of life and it should not
be a decision made by anyone but a woman herself.
Social policy is formulated to better society and the
individuals within. If we set boundaries in giving women the right to choose
what is best for her life, then we aren’t bettering the society at all. Women
live with restriction as it is and forcing a woman to have a child without her
being at her full potential to proceed with the responsibility of a healthy
pregnancy followed by proper care for a child is without question a decision that
can only be made by the one having to live with the repercussions.
References:
Crane,
Patrick B. (2012, October 3) Canadian Feminists back sex selection as valid
reason for abortion. Lifesitenews.com. Retrieved from:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-pro-aborts-refuse-to-condemn-sex-selection/
Deborah L. Rhode. (Spring, 1995), Media Images, Feminist Issues
Signs,
Vol. 20, No. 3 pp. 685-710. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3174839
Nikiashtonndp. (2012, April
27) Ashton's M-312 Speech, April 27 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qNLUpBDKUI